UC IPM Home
HOME
SEARCH
li>
ON THIS SITE
What is IPM?
Home & landscape pests
Agricultural pests
Natural environment pests
Exotic & invasive pests
Weed gallery
Natural enemies gallery
Weather, models & degree-days
Pesticide information
Research
Publications
Events & training
Links
Glossary
About us
Contact us
Research and IPM
Grants Programs: Projects Database
|
Search database
|
About the database
|
Grants programs
|
Project description
The effects of vineyard cultural practices on grape mealybug and its natural enemies. (00FE004)
Program
UC IPM competitive research grants program
Principal
investigator
K.M. Daane, Insect Biology, UC Berkeley
Host/habitat
Grapes
Pest
Grape Mealybug
Pseudococcus maritimus
Discipline
Entomology
Review
panel
Applied Field Ecology
Start year (duration)
2000 (One Year)
Objectives
Determine the effect of vineyard management practices (nitrogen fertilization, girdling and gibberellic acid on grape mealybug pest status and biology.
End-year
progress
Mealybug pest damage in vineyards has proved difficult to accurately predict. The grape mealybug,
Pseudococcus maritimus,
is the primary mealybug pest of Central Valley table grapes. Growers and PCAs have suggested that vigorous vine growth (e.g., fertilization) and berry sizing practices (e.g., girdling and gibberellic acid) are often associated with mealybug pest problems. In 2000, we tested these relationships in an experimental vineyard and greenhouse. In a Thompson seedless (cv.) vineyard, six nitrogen treatment levels (0, 25, 50, 100, 200, and 400 lbs N/acre) have been maintained since 1993. In this experimental block, we followed mealybug and parasitoid populations and compared mealybug density, size and fecundity with fertilization treatments, N petiole content, cane growth and pruning weights. This work was repeated in the greenhouse, using potted Thompson seedless plants that were provided with the same N fertilization levels as the field trial. Again, mealybug growth parameters were measured. Results from the field trial showed no difference between fertilization treatments or berry sizing practices in mealybug density or egg deposition. However, these results may have been influenced by the activity of natural enemies, which dramatically lowered mealybug densities. In contrast, the more controlled work conducted in greenhouse trials showed mealybug densities and egg deposition was higher in treatments with higher fertilization. We conclude that more vigorously growing vines can increase mealybug pest status. There is less evidence that berry sizing practices have any influence on mealybug pest densities.
Top of page