|
|
How to Manage Pests
UC Pest Management Guidelines
Citrus
Citrus Peelminer
Scientific Name: Marmara gulosa
(Reviewed 9/08,
updated 9/08)
In this Guideline:
|
|
|
Citrus peelminer is a pest of susceptible citrus varieties in the
Coachella and San Joaquin valleys. The San Joaquin Valley strain is genetically
related to a strain from Mexico and probably arrived on infested fruit during
1998-99. Adult moths deposit eggs on stems and fruit of citrus and neighboring
crops. A small larva hatches from the egg and begins feeding on the rind of the
fruit just below the egg shell. As the larva grows, it molts four to seven
times and mines the stem or fruit creating a winding tunnel that grows wider as
the larva gets larger. Just before pupation, the larva changes to a pink form
with spinning mouthparts. The pink stage larva leaves the mine and spins a flat
cocoon on a twig, leaf, or fruit. It decorates the cocoon with silk balls and
then pupates. There is no overwintering stage; the insect continues development
throughout the year, but the length of a generation is shorter during warm
temperatures. There are 6-8 generations a year occurring at about monthly
intervals from May to November.
The citrus leafminer, a small moth that attacks citrus, differs from citrus peelminer because its larval stages leave a frass trail in the mine and it attacks only
new flush leaves rather than stems and fruit. The leafminer pupa is found in
the curled edge of a leaf and lacks the decorative balls that the peelminer
creates.
Larvae form mines on the surface of the fruit. Grapefruit, pummelo,
and certain smooth-skinned navel varieties (Fukumoto, Atwood, TI) are most
susceptible to damage, but the peelminer can attack any variety. Susceptible
varieties can suffer 5-80% fruit damage, while nonsusceptible varieties rarely
experience more than 3% damaged fruit. Under heavy infestations, peelminers
will mine the leaves, but this is rare. Damage to fruit is cosmetic but one
mine can render it unacceptable for fresh market. This pest can attack many
different crops: grapes, cotton, beans, stone fruits, nuts, ornamentals
(willows and oleander), various vegetables, and weeds. Susceptible varieties of
citrus are at higher risk for damage if located next to crops where peelminer
populations build up (cotton and beans). Because citrus peelminer is usually
not an economic problem in the neighboring crops, it is rarely controlled in
those crops. When those crops reach maturity and begin to dry, the moths emerge
and move into neighboring citrus.
Future management of this pest will likely rely primarily on
biological control and cultural practices unless an effective pesticide can be
found. Pesticides are only somewhat effective against peelminer because of the
difficulty in obtaining good spray coverage of the fruit and penetration of the
pesticides into the mines. The moths prefer to lay eggs on fruit that is low
and on the inside of the tree, which is the hardest fruit to reach with sprays.
Biological
Control
There are
many native parasites that attack peelminer to a limited extent. One native
eulophid wasp, Cirrospilus coachellae, can control peelminer populations in the Coachella
Valley and research is currently in progress to determine if it can overwinter
and provide control in the San Joaquin Valley. Parasites pupate in the mine and
can be seen through the epidermis as small, black pupae surrounded by black
dots (fecal material). Evidence of past parasite activity are exit holes near
the remains of pupae. Long-term control of this pest will likely be biological.
The recent arrival of citrus leafminer to California may assist with biological
control of peelminer because they share many of the same natural enemies.
Cultural
Control
Avoid
planting susceptible citrus varieties such as Fukumoto oranges, grapefruit, and
pummelos. Locate plantings of these susceptible varieties away from neighboring
crops such as cotton and grapes that could be a source of peelminer. If cotton
is grown next to a susceptible citrus variety, then Bt cotton should be used or
an insecticide can be mixed with the defoliant to reduce the number of moths
emerging from the cotton.
Treatment Decisions
While citrus peelminer is sensitive to a number of different
insecticides, it is difficult to control with insecticides because it attacks
the inside low fruit (difficult to reach with sprays), the larval stage is
protected by the mine, and it has 6 to 8 generations. Development of a
pheromone trap is underway to improve treatment timing.
Studies have shown that the lower developmental threshold of
citrus peelminer is 55°F. The biofix of first flight in noncitrus host crops
usually occurs between the 3rd week of March and early April. From that point
on, every 580 degree-days, the peelminer completes a generation. There are 7
potential flights in the San Joaquin Valley and 9 potential flights in the
Coachella Valley. Hot summer temperatures tend to stop development of the
peelminer. The first two flights of citrus peelminer attack noncitrus hosts
such as the stems of walnuts, willows, oleander, and various weeds. The third
flight of moths finds the pummelo and grapefruit varieties suitable for attack
and the 4th or 5th flight begins to attack susceptible navel orange varieties.
A treatment strategy is to use degree-days to estimate the timing of the
flights that will attack a citrus variety and apply three treatments of
insecticides at monthly intervals to control the first three flights that could
potentially deposit eggs on citrus fruit. For example, pummelo and grapefruit
growers would treat flights 3, 4, and 5, while navel growers would treat
flights 5, 6, and 7.
Diflubenzuron (Micromite) is effective primarily against the egg
stage; time sprays of this insecticide to peaks in moth flights. Multiple
applications of one-third or one-half rates of diflubenzuron are more effective
than a single high rate. Addition of an adulticide such as chlorpyrifos or a
pyrethroid (fenpropathrin-Danitol or cyfluthrin-Baythroid) to the diflubenzuron
treatment helps somewhat. However, these insecticides are fairly broad spectrum
and may cause flare ups of other citrus pests because they destroy natural
enemies.
| Common name |
Amount to Use |
R.E.I.+ |
P.H.I.+ |
| (trade name) |
(type of coverage)** |
(hours) |
(days) |
|
| The following materials are listed in order of usefulness in an IPM program, taking into account efficacy and impact on natural enemies and honey bees. When choosing a pesticide, also consider information relating to environmental impact. Not all registered pesticides are listed. Always read label of product being used. |
| |
| A. |
DIFLUBENZURON* |
| |
(Micromite) 80 WGS |
2–6.25 oz/acre (OC) |
12 |
21 |
| |
RANGE OF ACTIVITY: Pests: intermediate (katydids, peelminer, leafminer, grasshoppers); Natural enemies: predatory beetles |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pests: intermediate; Natural enemies: intermediate |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 15 |
| |
COMMENTS: Can be used during bloom. Timing treatments for peaks
in moth flights is important because it only kills the egg stage of the
peelminer. There is a limit of 6.4 oz per 90-day period or 18.75 oz per year.
Do not apply within 25 feet of bodies of water. Use allowed under a FIFRA 2(ee) recommendation. |
| |
| B. |
DIFLUBENZURON* |
| |
(Micromite 80 WG) |
2–6.25 oz/acre (OC) |
12 |
21 |
| |
RANGE OF ACTIVITY: Pests: intermediate (katydids, peelminer, leafminer, grasshoppers); Natural enemies: predatory beetles |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pests: intermediate; Natural enemies: intermediate |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 15 |
| |
COMMENTS: Can be used during bloom. Timing treatments for peaks
in moth flights is important because it only kills the egg stage of the
peelminer. There is a limit of 6.4 oz per 90 day period or 18.75 oz per year.
Do not apply within 25 feet of bodies of water. Use allowed under a FIFRA 2(ee) recommendation. |
| |
. . . PLUS . . . |
| |
CHLORPYRIFOS* |
| |
(Lorsban) 4E |
2 pt/acre (OC) |
5 days |
21 |
| |
RANGE OF ACTIVITY: Pests: broad (many insects); Natural enemies: most |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pests: short (low rates), intermediate (high rates); Natural enemies: short (low rates), intermediate (high rates) |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 1B |
| |
COMMENTS: For use on all varieties. Do not apply more than
twice/fruit year or make applications less than 30 days apart. During the bloom period, apply from 1 hour after sunset until 2 hours before sunrise. |
| |
. . . or . . . |
| |
FENPROPATHRIN* |
| |
(Danitol) 2.4 EC |
21.33 fl oz/acre (OC) |
24 |
1 |
| |
RANGE OF ACTIVITY: Pests: broad (many insects and mites); Natural enemies: most |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pests: intermediate; Natural enemies: long |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 3A |
| |
COMMENTS: Apply in 50–200 gal water/acre. Use only on
citrus trees 3 years or older. To reduce the potential for resistance, make a
total of only one pyrethroid application (for all pest species) per year or
if feasible, only every 2 to 3 years. Do not apply in the vicinity of aquatic areas and do not apply more than 21.33 fl oz/acre/year. |
| |
. . . or . . . |
| |
CYFLUTHRIN* |
| |
(Baythroid) 2 |
6.4 fl oz/acre (OC) |
12 |
0 |
| |
RANGE OF ACTIVITY: Pests: broad (many insects); Natural enemies: most |
| |
PERSISTENCE: Pests: intermediate; Natural enemies: intermediate (low rates), long (high rates) |
| |
RESISTANCE: In some citrus thrips populations in the San Joaquin Valley |
| |
MODE OF ACTION GROUP NUMBER1: 3A |
| |
COMMENTS: Only a single application may be made per crop season.
To reduce the potential for resistance, make a total of only one pyrethroid
application (for all pest species) per year or, if feasible, only every 2 to
3 years. Do not apply within 25 feet of lakes, reservoirs, rivers, permanent
streams, marshes, or natural ponds, estuaries, and commercial fish farm ponds. |
| |
IMPORTANT LINKS
UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Citrus
UC ANR Publication 3441
Insects, Mites, and Snails
E. E. Grafton-Cardwell, Kearney Agricultural Center, Parlier
J. G. Morse, Entomology, UC Riverside
N. V. O‘Connell, UC Cooperative Extension, Tulare County
P. A. Phillips, UC IPM Program, UC Cooperative Extension, Ventura County
C. E. Kallsen, UC Cooperative Extension, Kern County
D. R. Haviland, UC Cooperative Extension, Kern County
Acknowledgments for contributions to Insect, Mites, and Snails:
J. Barcinas, E. S. I., Corona, CA
R. Dunn, Badger Farming County, Exeter, CA
J. Gorden, Pest Management Associates, Exeter, CA
H. Griffiths, E. S. I., Corona, CA
D. Machlitt, Consulting Entomology Services, Moorpark, CA
C. Musgrove, retired entomologist, Riverside, CA
K. Olsen, S & J Ranch, Pinedale, CA
T. Roberts, E. S. I., Corona, CA
J. Stewart, Pest Management Associates, Exeter, CA
P. Washburn, Washburn & Sons Citrus Pest Control, Riverside, CA
K. Godfrey, USDA Biological Control, Sacramento
D. Headrick, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
B. Faber, UC Cooperative Extension, Ventura County
J. Kabashima, UC Cooperative Extension, South Coast Research and Extension Center
Top of page
|